← The blogDo you have to ask health questions before a tattoo? 20 states say yes. Here are the questions.
September 10, 2026 · Chris, waivers.tattoo
Before the needle, do you have to ask the client about their health? In 20 states the rule says yes, and 17 of them tell you what to ask. The other 31 mostly ask nothing, and 10 of those still bar you from working on a client who is drunk or high. Here is what all 50 states and the District of Columbia say about health questions before a tattoo, in one table, each row read from the state's own rule and linked to it.
The 20 do it 4 ways. Oklahoma, Utah, Vermont and Nevada's Clark County put the questions inside the tattoo consent form itself. 7 want a form of its own: Alabama's written medical-information request, California's signed questionnaire, Georgia's client evaluation, Michigan's health questionnaire in the record, Minnesota's separate disclosure form, New Jersey's medical history form, and Maine's, whose contents the 2005 rule left blank. 7 make you ask and write down the answers: Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, North Dakota, Oregon, Ohio and South Carolina, and in Delaware and North Dakota the client signs a release saying you asked. Massachusetts and New Mexico turn it around: the artist tells the client which conditions raise the risk, out loud and in writing, and the client signs that none of them apply.
No row here carries a *. The state files grade their confidence on the record, the minors rule and the consent form, not on this section, so where a rule is thin the cell says so in words. Louisiana's health history is written as a should, not a shall, so it reads as no. Each state name links to its page on this site, which carries the whole rule.
This is a plain-language summary, not legal advice. Your local health department has the final word. Ask them, and bring your records.
| State | Health questions | The rule |
|---|
| Alabama | Yes, a written medical-information request, signed by both | Ala. Admin. Code r. 420-3-23 (Body Art Practice and Facilities) |
| Alaska | No; a board-approved information sheet instead | 12 Alaska Admin. Code ch. 09 (12 AAC 09), esp. 12 AAC 09.110 and 12 AAC 09.940 |
| Arizona | No state rule | Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3721 (Tattoos, brands, scarifications and piercings; minors; anesthesia) |
| Arkansas | No; a signed cautionary notice; no one with a history of jaundice | Ark. State Board of Health, Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Body Art Establishments (007.05.15-004, eff. February 2016) |
| California | Yes, a signed questionnaire | Cal. Health & Safety Code §§ 119300–119328 (Safe Body Art Act) |
| Colorado | Yes, asked to disclose | 6 CCR 1010-22 (Body Art Establishments) |
| Connecticut | No state rule, local may | Conn. Gen. Stat. ch. 387a, §§ 20-266n to 20-266s (Tattoo Technicians) |
| Delaware | Yes, asked to disclose; signs a release that you asked | 16 Del. Admin. Code 4451 (Body Art Establishments) |
| District of Columbia | No state rule | 17 DCMR ch. 37 (Board of Barber and Cosmetology) - the licensing rules DLCP points body artists at. No DC Health body art establishment chapter was found in the DCMR. |
| Florida | No state rule | Fla. Admin. Code ch. 64E-28 (Tattooing) |
| Georgia | Yes, a client evaluation | Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. ch. 511-3-8 (Body Art) |
| Hawaii | No; no one under the influence | Haw. Admin. R. ch. 11-17 (Tattoo Artist) |
| Idaho | No state rule | Idaho Code § 18-1523 (Minors — tattooing, branding, tanning devices and body piercing) |
| Illinois | Yes, asked to disclose | 77 Ill. Adm. Code Part 797 (Body Art Code) |
| Indiana | No state rule | 410 IAC 1-5 (Sanitary Operation of Tattoo Parlors), records at 410 IAC 1-5-28 |
| Iowa | No; no skin showing infection or irritation | Iowa Admin. Code 481—ch. 492 (Practice of Tattooing), formerly 641—ch. 22 |
| Kansas | No; written pre-service information on 14 conditions | K.A.R. 69-15-1 to 69-15-31 |
| Kentucky | No; a 3-line attestation (not intoxicated, not pregnant, no blood thinner) | 902 KAR 45:065 (Tattooing) |
| Louisiana | Should, not shall | La. Admin. Code tit. 51, Part XXVIII (Sanitary Code - Commercial Body Art) |
| Maine | Yes, contents undefined (a blank in the 2005 rule) | 10-144 C.M.R. ch. 210 (Rules Relating to Tattooing) |
| Maryland | No state rule | COMAR 10.06.01.06H (Communicable Diseases — General Control Measures; skin-penetrating body adornment procedures) |
| Massachusetts | Yes: told the risks, signs they have no condition | DPH Model Regulations for Body Art Establishments, §§ 1-16, as adopted by each board of health (e.g. Boston Public Health Commission Body Art Regulations; Haverhill Board of Health Body Art regulation) |
| Michigan | Yes, a completed health questionnaire in the record | Mich. Admin. Code R 333.13101-R 333.13121 (Body Art Facilities), filed September 11, 2025 |
| Minnesota | Yes, a separate signed disclosure form | Minn. Stat. ch. 146B (Body Art), §§ 146B.01-146B.10 |
| Mississippi | No; warnings on the consent form | 15 Miss. Code R. Pt. 19, Subpt. 60, ch. 11 (Regulations Governing the Registration of Individuals Performing Tattooing and Individuals Performing Body Piercing), Rules 11.1.1-11.10.1 |
| Missouri | No; no one under the influence | 20 CSR 2267-1 through 20 CSR 2267-4 (Office of Tattooing, Body Piercing, and Branding); records at 20 CSR 2267-3.010 |
| Montana | No form; conditions on the record, a physician's referral for some | Admin. R. Mont. 37.112.102–37.112.167 (amended eff. 4/26/2025) |
| Nebraska | No form; allergies and conditions on the record | 172 Neb. Admin. Code ch. 44 (Body Artists and Body Art Facilities), amended eff. 6/14/2023 |
| Nevada | Clark County: yes, on the form; rural counties: no | Nev. Admin. Code §§ 444.00701–444.00939 (state, rural counties, eff. 12/19/2017); Southern Nevada Health District Regulations Governing the Sanitation and Safety of Body Art Establishments (eff. 7/1/2022); Washoe County Health District Regulations Governing the Approval, Inspection, and Operation of Invasive Body Decoration Establishments (2017) |
| New Hampshire | No; the risks disclosed; no one who appears impaired | N.H. Code Admin. R. Plc 600 (Body Art Rules); inspections under Plc 400 |
| New Jersey | Yes, a medical history form | N.J. Admin. Code 8:27 (Body Art and Ear-Piercing Facility Standards), recodified and amended eff. July 18, 2022 |
| New Mexico | Yes: told the risks, signs they have no condition | 16.36.5 NMAC (Standards of Practice), part of 16.36 NMAC — Body Artists and Operators |
| New York | No; NYC guidance says ask about allergies | No statewide body-art regulations adopted yet. In New York City: NYC Health Code ch. 22 (§§ 22-01 to 22-16) and NYC Admin. Code §§ 17-357 to 17-362 |
| North Carolina | No; no visible jaundice, no unhealthy skin | 15A NCAC 18A .3201–.3212 — Rules Governing Tattooing |
| North Dakota | Yes, the rule lists the questions; signs a release that you asked | N.D. Admin. Code art. 33-41, ch. 33-41-01 (Tattoo and Body Art), §§ 33-41-01-01 to -14 |
| Ohio | Yes: asked about conditions that could affect healing; a physician's note if so | Ohio Admin. Code ch. 3701-9 (rules 3701-9-01 to 3701-9-09) |
| Oklahoma | Yes, 9 questions inside the consent form | Okla. Admin. Code 310:233 (Body Piercing and Tattooing) |
| Oregon | Yes, part of the client record | Or. Admin. R. 331-915-0000 to 331-915-0085 (tattooing) |
| Pennsylvania | No state rule; Philadelphia: a physician first for some | 18 Pa.C.S. § 6311 (Tattooing and body piercing) |
| Rhode Island | No; the artist checks the skin | 216-RICR-40-10-15 (Tattoo Artists and Tattoo Parlors), effective 2022-01-04 |
| South Carolina | Yes: asked about conditions that could affect healing; a physician's statement if so | S.C. Code Regs. 60-111 (Standards for Licensing Tattoo Facilities) |
| South Dakota | No; no lesions, infection, contagious disease, or under the influence | S.D. Admin. R. art. 44:12, ch. 44:12:01 (tattooing) and ch. 44:12:02 (body piercing) |
| Tennessee | No; no one under the influence, no unhealthy skin | Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. ch. 1200-23-03 (Tattoo Artist and Tattoo Establishment) |
| Texas | No; no one drunk or high, no rash, boil, infection or abrasion | 25 Tex. Admin. Code ch. 229, subch. V, §§ 229.401-229.413 |
| Utah | Yes, 11 questions inside the consent form | Utah Admin. Code R392-701 (Body Art Facility Sanitation) |
| Vermont | Yes, on the client form | Administrative Rules for Tattooing and Body Piercing, Code Vt. R. 04-030-310 |
| Virginia | No state rule | 18 VAC 41-50 (Tattooing Regulations); client rules at 18VAC41-50-410 |
| Washington | No state rule | Ch. 308-22 WAC (body art, body piercing, and tattooing rules); ch. 246-145 WAC (sterilization and infection control) |
| West Virginia | No; an attestation on intoxication, on the consent form | W. Va. Code ch. 16, art. 38 (Tattoo Studio Business), Sec. 16-38-1 through 16-38-7 |
| Wisconsin | No; no one under the influence, no visible lesions | Wis. Admin. Code ch. SPS 221; patrons, consent and records at SPS 221.10 |
| Wyoming | No state rule; Natrona County: yes | Wyo. Stat. Sec. 14-3-107 (performing body-art on persons who have not reached the age of majority) |
The questions the rules ask
17 of the 20 name the conditions. Counted across their rules, as read for the state pages:
- Diabetes: 16 of the 17
- An allergy, to latex, pigments, dyes, antibiotics or soaps: 15
- Hemophilia, or a bleeding or clotting disorder: 15
- Skin disease, or a condition at the site, such as lesions, herpes or psoriasis: 15
- Blood thinners: 14
- Epilepsy, seizures or fainting: 10
- Hepatitis, HIV, or another bloodborne or communicable disease: 9
- Pregnancy or nursing: 8
- A heart condition: 6
- When the client last ate: 5
- Medications, generally: 5
- Drugs or alcohol, asked as a question: 3
- Keloids: 2
- An immune disorder: 2
Those are floors. A rule that names more than its state page quotes is undercounted here.
So the questionnaire most of the country is describing is 5 questions long: diabetes, a bleeding disorder, skin disease at the site, allergies, blood thinners. The longer lists add epilepsy, pregnancy and a heart condition. North Dakota's is the longest written into a rule: diabetes, hemophilia, skin disease or sensitivities, pigment allergies, epilepsy or fainting, blood thinners, medications beyond routine antibiotics, allergy medicine and birth control, hepatitis, HIV, high blood pressure or heart disease, pregnancy, contagious disease, immune disorders, and serious physical or mental health problems, N.D. Admin. Code § 33-41-01-05. Utah's 11 questions include whether the client has eaten in the last 4 hours and taken a blood thinner or an NSAID in the last 24, R392-701-14. Vermont asks about the last 2 hours' food and mitral valve prolapse, Code Vt. R. 04-030-310.
When a yes stops the work
A yes is not a no. In Ohio, a client who reports a condition that could affect healing is not tattooed without documentation from a physician, Ohio Admin. Code 3701-9-04. South Carolina wants a physician's signed statement that the tattoo is not contraindicated before the work starts, S.C. Code Regs. 60-111. Minnesota lets the technician decline if a condition shows up, and makes the form say the technician will not work on a client who does not complete and sign it, Minn. Stat. § 146B.07. Massachusetts and New Mexico have the client sign that they have no disqualifying condition. Montana never asks a questionnaire and still wants a written physician referral before working on a client on blood thinners, with a bleeding condition, recent IV drug use, a sunburn, skin disease, an infection or a mole at the site, or a pigment or soap allergy, ARM 37.112. Philadelphia makes the operator advise a client in its named risk categories to see a physician first.
The 31 that ask nothing still screen
31 states have no health questionnaire, and most of them screen anyway, without a form. 10 bar working on a client who is drunk or high: Hawaii, Missouri, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin, New Hampshire for anyone who appears impaired, and Kentucky, West Virginia and Mississippi with a line on the form where the client says so themselves. 7 make you look at the skin before you start: Iowa, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Wisconsin refuse a site with a rash, a lesion, an infection or a wound, and North Carolina and Arkansas add jaundice, visible in one, a history of it in the other.
Kansas hands the client a written sheet on 14 conditions instead of asking about them, K.A.R. 69-15-15. Mississippi's consent form carries warnings for clients with diabetes, HIV, end-stage renal disease or a heart condition rather than questions, Rule 11.5.10. Montana and Nebraska skip the form and make the record carry any allergy or condition that could hamper healing, which means you asked.
What happens to the answers
The answers are health information about a person, and the rules treat them that way. They go in the client's record, they stay there as long as the record stays, and the inspector can ask to see that the question was asked. Utah's rule says why the questions are there: "to evaluate the client's condition for receiving body art without violating the client's medical privacy", R392-701-14. That is the right read of every list in the table. The questions exist so the artist knows what they are working with before the needle. They are not a mailing list.
20 states write the questions down. In all 51 the client is sitting in front of you, and the 5 questions most of the country agrees on take a minute to ask. Ask them, and write down the answers.